I would agree that it does not seem to be the ideal approach to governing but then- what is? These days tenure of the elected representatives is fixed. Muscle power and money power work hand-in-hand to ensure success to him. Its administration is ruled and conducted with a sense of dedication, and people under this system discuss matters and problems thoroughly to come up with sensible decisions. This type of government can be very powerful and insight some wonderful things, but it also has the ability to go very wrong, very quickly. Your overview of the positives and negatives of democracy show why democracy works when it works and doesn't work when it doesn't work. The Advantages of a Representative Democracy 1. So, when there is something that they find unfavorable or is not implemented properly, they can make a stand and let their representatives act on it.
Real power lies in the hands of the people who exercise it by the representatives elected by them and who are responsible to them. But in spite of this, the parties aim at their publicity but not the plight of an ordinary man. Learn about the advantages and disadvantages of a democratic system. He was envisioning the change to a salaried parliament and the effect this would give in enabling businesses to have undue influence on parliament. Because of this power in the hands of everyday citizens, the theoretical political control of the country lies with the majority as opposed to a select few in power. It allows a little chance of revolution.
The most important merit of democracy is that power ultimately rests in the hands of the people who elect their leaders. All members of the State are equal in the eyes of law. When done correctly, democracy creates an environment that develops good citizens to use the power allowed them. During attacks, the shops and markets remain closed. Universal adult franchise grants right to vote to everybody. This includes leaders, officials, people, businessmen, etc. And this is because of the eminence, devotion and conviction in man found in the nature of democracy itself.
With the freedom to vote, a person can feel he or she is significant and relevant to society. A democracy works when the power is left within the hands of its people. Individuals may not be voting on individual issues within a representative democracy, but they can still have their opinions heard. Because of this assignment and delegation, decisions can be make quicker and this makes the government more responsive to a potential emergency situation. In this way democracy, although a group-oriented approach, can become very much about what individuals believe is best for themselves and not for the majority.
Ministers are proving white elephants. In a monarchy, it's one person who can take decisions and ensure their quick implementation. If you look at history, democracy state usually have better chance to survive against corruption and ruler misusing their power. Often they will choose the latter. For this again prices are hiked to maintain the budget of the government and again that money can be misused. These representative democracy advantages and disadvantages show us that this structure of government sacrifices individuality for speed and efficiency. Democracy aims to create the ideal environment that is conducive to personality improvement, character cultivation and good habits.
The leaders abuse each other, and the common man is tired to see this drama. This is fundamental right provided by law. However, like all forms of government, a democratic government is not without benefits and setbacks. It allows people to voice out their issues. When there are important decisions to be made, more people show up to vote. It allows the government to react quickly. Electioneering is carried out with money.
They have a good knowledge of the people's needs. People tend to have higher morale and a better quality of life when they feel like they have basic human rights. This also means that the people should vote for those who possess the education and training. The rich hold the media and use it for their own benefit. This leads to a wastage of money and resources, which could have been used in public interest.
Since elected officials are given the chance to be in office by way of the number of votes or a majority vote, members of the minority might not be given the voice. The citizens have the power to elect whom they want to assume office. It is, therefore, more stable than other forms of Government. This we can see as most politicians support rich people in return for monetary benefits like party funds etc. They have to discern who the best person is to represent them and defend the beliefs and opinions they hold so dear.