The feedstock is considered a renewable resource because it gets its energy from photosynthesis while replenishing itself naturally. There is less harm to the engine. This connection to the land could also be viewed as a disadvantage, however. All of the peripheral industries connected with farming, such as transportation and food processing, would benefit from the economic demands of ethanol production. According to some experts, the production of corn-based ethanol as an alternative fuel may end up requiring more energy than the fuel can generate, especially when counting the high energy costs of synthetic fertilizer production. Energy During Production One of the biggest cons of ethanol involves the amount of energy that is required during the production process of this fuel.
In E85, gasoline is used to provide enough starting power for cars in cold weather. But, it does make power. E85 lowers some pollutants and increases others. Fuel economy, however, dropped across the board. Being able to grow ethanol-producing crops reduces the pressure to drill in environmentally-sensitive places, such as the north slope of Alaska, the Arctic Ocean, and the Gulf of Mexico. Effect on Fuel Consumption Despite the benefits attributed to this renewable form of energy, critics say that the distance covered by a car or vehicle to reach a certain place or destination is shorter with the use of ethanol. In order to produce enough corn or grain or sugar cane to meet the demands of the ethanol industry, farmers may have to restrict how much of their crop will be available for other uses.
These cars and trucks are designed to run on either gasoline or blends up to E85. And it is true that ethanol is less efficient than gasoline, which is natural since it has a lower energy density. Now, as we discover that our fossil fuels are running low, some look to corn-based ethanol as the solution to cleaner, renewable energy. This occurs because drivers are inclined to drive further and longer because they feel like they are causing less damage to the planet. The amount of additional energy needed to transport and process the corn could result in a neutral or even negative return on the energy produced by the ethanol. When it comes to ethanol aka E85 , there's no shortage of disagreement over its viability as a fuel source.
We quickly found there are no commercial stations in Connecticut, where our auto-test center is located, where we could fill up with E85. That keeps it from being more widely used. In fact, the starch only makes up 50% of the kernels. When it comes to producing and consuming ethanol fuel, the United States and Brazil rank as the largest consumers. Its as if they try to make everything work on the opposite end of efficient, and mainstream america wonders why we have so much debt lol. We need a nation of people questioning our nation's goals during this time in history.
They are only in charge of air and water quality, not approving or disapproving anything. These new methods can't support themselves financially either. But that might be a relatively minor evil, however. Ethanol is also biodegradable, non-toxic and dissolves in water. Sources There are many ways to produce this type of biofuel. The government also says corn is not a good long-term fuel source because it diverts corn from the food supply.
Biofuel means energy derived from plants like sugarcane, grains, and corn. Today about two dozen cellulosic ethanol plants are under development in the United States. . Governments and automobile manufacturers have recognized the benefits of using it and are working towards integrating it into everyday use. It is due to such a situation that the use of Ethanol fuel has increased in many countries. They drain the system and add new gas that has a stabilizer in it after diagnosing the issue. Hydrogen: Again, it is just plain stupid to take a base fuel like natural gas, convert it to hydrogen, and try to build an infrastructure all over America to fuel cars why not just use the natural gas to fuel cars? A poplar tree farm is used to make cellulosic ethanol more sustainable in the U.
Most experts don't see the future of the ethanol industry taking root in America's cornfields. That compares to a total of 150,000 gas stations in the country. The expense of distilling ethanol is another substantial issue with the fuel. Spills are less of a problem with this fuel as well. Along with that we also have less ethanol fueling stations. Aside from that, ethanol attracts water, increasing the risk of rust forming on the interior engine parts. Everyone talks about the oil shortage but few seem to realize that: 1.
Again, if it weren't subsidized by the government, it wouldn't be here! The use of ethanol as a gasoline additive was also increased when the pollution fighting fuel additive, , was found to pollute the ground water and was banned by many states. Producing enough ethanol to replace America's imported oil alone would require putting nearly 900 million acres under cultivation—or roughly 95 percent of the active farmland in the country. Corn doesn't grow like a weed. This means that the feedstock and fuel production does not require more energy than the amount already in the fuel. Some people ask, is there really a conspiracy? Called the , it assumes that 1 billion tons of organic material could be used, with no loss of corn for food or feed, from resources such as forest waste organic residue, and energy crops such as switchgrass. Studies show that corn-based ethanol fuel creates a truly positive energy balance.